Skip to: Site menu | Main content

e-Learning 2.0

Great article by Tony Karrer on Learning Circuits: Understanding E-Learning 2.0, especially for, but not limited to, those who have not heard about the concept.

I particularly liked his comparison of e-learning 1.0, 1.3 and 2.0. I can’t help noting that he speaks mostly about learning in the corporate world. From a University point of view, I’d go for some 1.3 elements over their 2.0 equivalents (and, as he says, I also believe that the three versions will coexist and that teachers will ‘mix and match’ to choose their best solution to any given situation).

Teaching digital natives

Some resources. Via.

And more things I should be reading

This time in the International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) (free, requires registration, links are to abstracts):

More things I should be reading

All of them in the European Journal of Open and Distance Learning (EURODL).

First Monday

I had heard about First Monday, peer-reviewed journal on the internet (it is, after all, home to such classics as The Cathedral and the Bazaar by Eric S. Raymond and The Attention Economy, by Michael H. Goldhaber, but after spending just a few minutes browsing this year’s contents, the amount of very attractive content is quite simply, overwhelming. In reverse chronological order (as belongs to a blog):

One Laptor Per Child. Or not

Something to reflect on on today’s New York times (and not really about the OLPC project): Seeing No Progress, Some Schools Drop Laptops.

The students at Liverpool High have used their school-issued laptops to exchange answers on tests, download pornography and hack into local businesses. When the school tightened its network security, a 10th grader not only found a way around it but also posted step-by-step instructions on the Web for others to follow (which they did).

We should always remember that technology per se is not the solution. We first need a problem, we then pose a question and then we seek for answers. Putting answers forward and then looking for questions is not a good way to move forward. If you don’t have a plan to use computers, don’t buy them. If you don’t have a very good use for a computer in the classroom, don’t use it. If you don’t have a really good idea of how students will behave once they’re given a laptop, don’t give them one.

But, of course,

“Where laptops and Internet use make a difference are in innovation, creativity, autonomy and independent research,” he said. “If the goal is to get kids up to basic standard levels, then maybe laptops are not the tool. But if the goal is to create the George Lucas and Steve Jobs of the future, then laptops are extremely useful.”

Meaning that, for some uses, computers are a tool allowing educators and learners to dome things that would be impossible without them. It is then that you should first do some research and then use computers in teaching (which doesn’t necessarily mean in the classroom).

Things I should be reading

I just discovered (thank you!) the International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning. Among the many articles I should be reading:

Like YouTube. For lectures!

Amazing new service I found today: VideoLectures is “YouTube for lectures”, and could become an AMAZING resource easily…

To get a taste try, for example, Where the Social Web Meets the Semantic Web.

Amazing. Now they’re lacking an easy way to embed lectures in one’s own homepage,à la YouTube… (and RSS feeds, and tagging, and rating, and… ;-) ).